AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Actor observer bias khan academy2/17/2024 ![]() ![]() And in fact, some of them were even upset that the experiment ended early. Prisoners left the study before the six days were up, none of the guards left. I mentioned this before in the last video, but while a number of the And they placed basically all of the blame for their behavior on the prisoners. Think that their behavior was all that extreme. Or that they deserved itīecause they were troublemakers. Thought that the prisoners were just faking it, or that they were wimps. Prisoners' emotional distress, many of them said that they Prisoners so harshly, especially in the face of the One question afterwards about why the had treated the Now let's talk a littleīit about the guards. They were volunteers whoĬould have left at any point. But I just want to point out that while these participants wereīeing treated like prisoners, they were not actually prisoners. Or maybe they knew that they could leave, but they didn't want toįorfeit any of the money that they were going to Maybe they somehow convincedĮach other to stay. Some of them misunderstood and didn't think that they could leave. It was in the consentįorm that they signed. That they were able to do so at least on some level, because it was told to them at the beginning of the experiment. In the prisoner condition that were released from the experiment because of emotional trauma, none of the prisoners ever I also want to note that while there were a number of participants Some inmates and not others, the guards really broke any solidarity that the prisoners had. The rebellious prisoners by taking those things away. Or brush their teeth after they had punished Keep their mattresses and to wash themselves, Who they saw as good prisoners by giving them different And the guards' unequal treatment really didn't encourage solidarity. ![]() In reality, the prisoners were pretty distrustful of each other. Instances of this behavior, it really wasn't the norm. Gave the impression that the prisoners banded together and helped each other out. After watching my previous video, I thought that it maybe And I also wanted to talkĪbout the prison itself. Screened for any kind of physical or psychological conditions before the start of the study. Middle-class background, and they had all been They were all college students, and they all had the same Participants were the same, or very similar, when they walked in. But first, I want you to remember that all of the ![]() Moreover, the intergroup attribution bias serves as an integral component of the intergroup prejudice syndrome.To talk a little bit about the Zimbardo prison study, and what conclusions we can draw from it. Together with such closely related processes as the fundamental attribution error and actor-observer asymmetry, the intergroup attribution bias has proven highly useful in a great variety of applications. Similarly, empathy and special training can significantly reduce the bias. Asian cultures, for example, tend to be less prone to the intergroup attribution bias, while strong emotions can induce either more or less of the bias. Many moderators and mediators of the effect have been uncovered. Ingroup protection (explaining away negative ingroup behavior as situationally determined – “given the situation, we had to act that way”) is typically a stronger effect than ingroup enhancement (accepting positive ingroup behavior as dispositionally determined – “as a people, we are kind and compassionate toward other groups”). It holds that group attributions, especially among the highly prejudiced, will be biased for the in-group and against out-groups. Its principal contentions flow from phenomena already uncovered by attribution research on individual behavior. The guiding theory for research in this area has been largely structured by the predictions of the ultimate attribution error (more accurately described as the intergroup attribution bias). But in the 1970s social psychologists began to consider causal attributions made about groups. This initial interest was limited to how individuals causally interpreted the behavior of other individuals. Attribution theory began in the late 1950s and 1960s. Intergroup attribution refers to causal attributions that people make about the behavior of out-groups and their own in-group. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |